Weekly Project Manager Review
Fill out the form below. Click "Send Email" to open your default mail app with the full report pre-filled. See below for coaching and rating guide.
Coaching Guidance for Completing Your Weekly Review
- Be specific. Skip generalities—name crew members, clients, and exact issues or wins.
- Think upstream. What decisions or habits earlier in the week created problems or wins later?
- Own your role. If something didn’t go well, what could you have done differently?
- Show leadership. Highlight how you're supporting your team’s growth, not just results.
- Elevate the standard. Don’t just report. Use this as a tool to raise expectations and clarity.
- Stay professional. Assume this report could be read by senior leaders or used in development meetings.
- Focus on impact. Your manager wants to support you—but you have to name what matters most this week.
Every great team has great communication. Your weekly review is a chance to lead from the front.
Team Performance Rating Guide
Use this to score your team's overall performance. Look for patterns—not one-offs—and assess fairly across jobs and days.
Safety
- 1: Multiple crew members neglect PPE or create unsafe conditions. Near-misses or unsafe habits are frequent.
- 2: Some safe behavior, but inconsistency across the crew. Safety feels reactive, not built-in.
- 3: Team follows core safety rules, wears PPE, and addresses basic risks.
- 4: Crew anticipates hazards, preps proactively, and models good habits for others on site.
- 5: Safety is part of the crew’s culture. Team checks each other, leads safety talks, and sets the tone on every site.
Quality
- 1: Frequent rework. Sloppy results or incomplete work are common. Client complaints or callbacks occurred.
- 2: Work meets minimum expectations but lacks detail or consistency across team members.
- 3: Quality is solid overall. Crew meets scope, and finishes are generally clean with minor punch items.
- 4: Team consistently produces clean, complete work. Pride in craftsmanship is evident on every task.
- 5: Crew delivers high-end, portfolio-level results. Quality standards are visible, shared, and upheld by all.
Efficiency
- 1: Crew is often behind. Downtime, backtracking, or poor prep slows job progress repeatedly.
- 2: Team completes jobs, but prep and sequencing are hit or miss. Efficiency varies day to day.
- 3: Projects stay generally on track. Crew stages well and avoids obvious waste or idle time.
- 4: Team moves with purpose. Tools and materials are ready. Time is used intentionally and effectively.
- 5: Jobs finish early or under hours. Crew works ahead, adapts to delays, and models elite planning and flow.
Dependability
- 1: Multiple call-offs, gear left behind, or last-minute schedule changes disrupted work.
- 2: Team is mostly reliable but needs reminders or oversight to stay consistent and ready.
- 3: Crew shows up, communicates clearly, and follows through on plans and expectations.
- 4: Team steps up proactively—handling tasks without being asked and keeping others informed.
- 5: Reliable, prepared, and fully accountable. You trust this crew to execute without follow-up or micromanagement.