Project Manager Meeting Prep

Weekly Project Manager Review

Fill out the form below. Click "Send Email" to open your default mail app with the full report pre-filled. See below for coaching and rating guide.

Project Manager Info





Team Performance – Core Categories (1–5)













⭐ Recognition & Concerns





Client Feedback



Barriers or Bottlenecks



Support Needed



Strategic Suggestions (Optional)



Send Email

Coaching Guidance for Completing Your Weekly Review

  • Be specific. Skip generalities—name crew members, clients, and exact issues or wins.
  • Think upstream. What decisions or habits earlier in the week created problems or wins later?
  • Own your role. If something didn’t go well, what could you have done differently?
  • Show leadership. Highlight how you're supporting your team’s growth, not just results.
  • Elevate the standard. Don’t just report. Use this as a tool to raise expectations and clarity.
  • Stay professional. Assume this report could be read by senior leaders or used in development meetings.
  • Focus on impact. Your manager wants to support you—but you have to name what matters most this week.

Every great team has great communication. Your weekly review is a chance to lead from the front.

Team Performance Rating Guide

Use this to score your team's overall performance. Look for patterns—not one-offs—and assess fairly across jobs and days.

Safety

  • 1: Multiple crew members neglect PPE or create unsafe conditions. Near-misses or unsafe habits are frequent.
  • 2: Some safe behavior, but inconsistency across the crew. Safety feels reactive, not built-in.
  • 3: Team follows core safety rules, wears PPE, and addresses basic risks.
  • 4: Crew anticipates hazards, preps proactively, and models good habits for others on site.
  • 5: Safety is part of the crew’s culture. Team checks each other, leads safety talks, and sets the tone on every site.

Quality

  • 1: Frequent rework. Sloppy results or incomplete work are common. Client complaints or callbacks occurred.
  • 2: Work meets minimum expectations but lacks detail or consistency across team members.
  • 3: Quality is solid overall. Crew meets scope, and finishes are generally clean with minor punch items.
  • 4: Team consistently produces clean, complete work. Pride in craftsmanship is evident on every task.
  • 5: Crew delivers high-end, portfolio-level results. Quality standards are visible, shared, and upheld by all.

Efficiency

  • 1: Crew is often behind. Downtime, backtracking, or poor prep slows job progress repeatedly.
  • 2: Team completes jobs, but prep and sequencing are hit or miss. Efficiency varies day to day.
  • 3: Projects stay generally on track. Crew stages well and avoids obvious waste or idle time.
  • 4: Team moves with purpose. Tools and materials are ready. Time is used intentionally and effectively.
  • 5: Jobs finish early or under hours. Crew works ahead, adapts to delays, and models elite planning and flow.

Dependability

  • 1: Multiple call-offs, gear left behind, or last-minute schedule changes disrupted work.
  • 2: Team is mostly reliable but needs reminders or oversight to stay consistent and ready.
  • 3: Crew shows up, communicates clearly, and follows through on plans and expectations.
  • 4: Team steps up proactively—handling tasks without being asked and keeping others informed.
  • 5: Reliable, prepared, and fully accountable. You trust this crew to execute without follow-up or micromanagement.